KOREAPIS

Calendar rules developers should not rebuild every time.

A planned developer API for Korean public holidays and business-day calculations with clear JSON and error contracts.

MVP planning · Preparing to build

Small API surfaces, explicit rules

The first proposed scope focuses on the calendar logic that repeatedly appears in Korean service development.

Holiday information

Return planned date and holiday information in a consistent shape, with the applicable calendar rule visible in the documentation.

Business-day calculation

Calculate a next or previous business day from a date and a specified direction. Boundary cases are part of the contract design.

Predictable integration

JSON responses and error behavior are being designed together. API keys and quota controls are design topics, not a currently available service.

A clear delivery flow

The interface is planned around explicit inputs, deterministic rules, and documented responses.

  1. 01

    State the date question

    Choose a date, calculation direction, and requested result.

  2. 02

    Apply verified rules

    Use deterministic calendar and holiday rules for the core calculation.

  3. 03

    Receive a contract response

    Read the result or a documented error code.

Proposed interface, not a live endpoint

GET /v1/business-days/next?date={input-date}
200 { "date": "{calculated-date}" }
Errors will use a documented JSON contract.

Claude for clearer integration guidance

Claude is useful where explanation and developer guidance need review. The core date calculation remains rule based and testable.

Current: Claude Code in planning

Claude Code assists with requirement clarification, contract drafts, and boundary-value test design while the team reviews the resulting decisions.

Planned: integration guidance

Once the API is built, we plan to evaluate sending a developer’s question, sanitized error code, and public specification to Claude. The output would explain a correction with a relevant code example, reducing time spent searching integration docs.

Check the guidance against the source

Guidance would link to the relevant specification and ask developers to test suggested code. Date results would continue to come from tested API rules. We would evaluate specification accuracy and whether examples run correctly.

Questions

Is the API available now?

No. KoreAPIs is in MVP planning and preparing to build; the example interface is not a live endpoint.

How will correctness be checked?

The plan includes contract and boundary-value tests for calendar rules, then review of documentation and any optional explanatory AI output.

Product conversation

Talk about KoreAPIs.

tkddyd420@jinsongtech.com